A Data-Driven Artificial Intelligence Framework for Predictive Maintenance in Smart Manufacturing

Authors

  • Yuchen Zhao School of Mechanical Engineering,Shanghai Jiao Tong University
  • Shuai Chen School of Control Science and Engineering,Shandong University
  • Robert L. Mitchell Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering,University of California, Irvine
  • Daniel P. Foster Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering,Purdue University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.66280/ijair.v1i1.1

Keywords:

Predictive Maintenance Artificial Intelligence Smart Manufacturing Data-Driven Modeling Industrial AI

Abstract

Predictive maintenance  (PdM) is a cornerstone capability for smart manufacturing, where maintenance actions are increasingly triggered by data and optimized against operational con- straints rather than by fixed schedules.  Despite rapid progress in sensing, industrial connectivity, and learning algorithms, practitioners still face persistent gaps:  (i) heterogeneous and imperfect data streams; (ii) distribution shift across assets, sites, and operating regimes; (iii) uncertainty in remaining useful life (RUL) estimation and failure risk forecasting; and (iv) the translation from  model  outputs  to  actionable  maintenance  decisions  under  cost,  safety,  and  availability requirements.

This paper proposes a data-driven artificial intelligence framework that unifies (1) an indus- trial data layer for acquisition, synchronization, and feature governance;  (2) a modeling layer that  supports  both  sequence-to-RUL  regression  and  time-to-event  (survival)  prediction  with calibrated  uncertainty;  and  (3)  a  decision  layer  that  maps  forecasts  to  maintenance  policies through cost-aware optimization.  We provide core mathematical formulations, pseudocode for the training and deployment pipeline, and implementation-ready design choices for edge–cloud execution in modern smart factories.  The manuscript is written to be reusable as an engineer- ing reference:  assumptions are stated explicitly,  interfaces between modules are defined,  and evaluation protocols are aligned with common public benchmarks and industrial constraints.

References

[1] J. Theil, C. Rosenkranz, and J. Weinand, “A review of smart manufacturing–based predictive maintenance solutions and research directions,” Forum, vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 1–44, 2025.

[2] M. Iswad, M. Nasir, L. Zhang et al., “Data-driven predictive maintenance in industry 4.0: A systematic literature review,” International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, pp. 1–33, 2025.

[3] Y. Yesar, R. Sharma, and P. Kumar, “Data-driven predictive maintenance for smart manufac- turing: Current challenges and future trends,” Computers & Industrial Engineering, vol. 188, p. 109918, 2024.

[4] A. Sharma, T. Hedberg et al., “A smart manufacturing predictive maintenance data archi- tecture for interoperable and scalable analytics,” in Proceedings of the Winter Simulation Conference (WSC), 2023, pp. 1–12.

[5] G. Pitel, R. Jurdak et al., “A roadmap for predictive maintenance with digital twins in smart manufacturing,” 2023.

[6] M. Fahim, A. Rehman et al., “Digital twins for maintenance in smart manufacturing: Concepts, methods, and industrial perspectives,” Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, pp. 1–27, 2024.

[7] Y. Zhang, H. Wang, and Q. Li, “Remaining useful life prediction with graph attention and dual attention transformer for multi-sensor degradation data,” International Journal of Fatigue, vol. 176, p. 107829, 2023.

[8] J. Liu, Y. Chen, and X. Zhao, “Denoising transformer networks for remaining useful life pre- diction under complex operating conditions,” Energies, vol. 16, no. 4, p. 1921, 2023.

[9] S. Kim, J. Park, and H. Lee, “An improved transformer for remaining useful life prediction with multi-scale feature fusion,” Electronics, vol. 13, no. 6, p. 1102, 2024.

[10] A. Vaswani, N. Shazeer, N. Parmar et al., “Attention is all you need,” in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 2017.

[11] J. Kang, Y. Lin et al., “Distribution-free prediction intervals for remaining useful life via conformal prediction,” International Journal of Prognostics and Health Management, vol. 14, no. 2, 2023.

[12] S. Feldman, S. Bates et al., “Copal: Conformal prediction after learning for time-series fore- casting,” in Proceedings of the International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML), ser. Proceedings of Machine Learning Research, 2024.

[13] D. Serrano, M. García et al., “Explainable artificial intelligence for predictive maintenance of rotating machinery: Methods and case studies,” IEEE Access, vol. 12, pp. 34 567–34 592, 2024.

[14] T. Schmalenbach, J. Krüger et al., “From model to maintenance: A case study on deploying predictive maintenance with calibrated uncertainty in a smart factory,” Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research, vol. 77, pp. 1–24, 2025.

[15] M. Rahman, S. Islam et al., “Evidential deep learning for uncertainty-aware remaining use- ful life estimation in industrial assets,” Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Soft Computing Research, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 55–76, 2025.

[16] R. Khan, T. Nguyen et al., “Federated learning for predictive maintenance in industrial iot: Challenges and a reference architecture,” 2023.

[17] L. Gomez, J. Park et al., “Edge ai for predictive maintenance in smart manufacturing: Design patterns and benchmarking,” 2024.

Downloads

Published

2026-01-30 — Updated on 2026-03-02

Versions

How to Cite

Zhao, Y., Chen, S., Mitchell, R. L., & Foster, D. P. (2026). A Data-Driven Artificial Intelligence Framework for Predictive Maintenance in Smart Manufacturing. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.66280/ijair.v1i1.1 (Original work published January 30, 2026)